Paper Review Presentation
Presentation
- We’ll have two presentations each day, and each presentation will be 20 mins long.
- The presenter will ask at least three questions during the presentation.
You’ll need to answer them in the Slack #lectures channel (as we’ve done in previous lectures).
- Each presentation will be followed by a 7-10 min group discussion.
- After the group discussion, the presenter will have 5 mins to answer questions.
Group Discussion
- One of the group members will be selected as a group moderator.
(Our TA will post the list of group moderators in the Slack #paper-reviews channel.)
- The group moderator is responsible for
- leading the discussion,
- writing questions in the Slack #paper-reviews channel, and
- build a consensus of the presentation evaluation.
- After the group discussion, our TA will send a direct message to the group moderators in Slack and ask about the peer evaluation result.
Peer Evaluaton
Please evaluate the presentation based on the following criteria:
- The presenter clearly delivered the problem statement and the key ideas.
- The presentation was well organized and prepared.
- The presenter was knowledgeable about the topic and any related issues.
- The presenter maintained my interest during the entire presentation.
- The visual aids were effective.
DO NOT evaluate based on
- speech skills (it’s not a speech course),
- technical issues of zoom, and
- whether the presenter used the author’s other’s slides.
(Feel free to use slides on the Internet with reference.)
In each group, please write a short comment to the presenter and choose one of the following (you can choose in-betweens):
-
Probably the best presentation!
-
It was clear and well organized.
-
Good, but I couldn’t follow some.
-
It could be better!
-
Poor.
DO NOT write the evaluation result in the public channel.
Our TA will send a direct message to the group moderators in Slack and ask about the peer evaluation result.